In a significant policy shift following backlash from the cryptocurrency industry and internal disagreements within the ruling coalition, Italy is set to reduce its proposed increase on capital gains taxes for digital assets. The original plan, part of the country’s preliminary 2025 budget framework, aimed to raise the tax rate on cryptocurrency gains from 26% to 42%. However, this steep hike now appears unlikely as key political figures signal a major recalibration.
Revised Tax Plans Amid Industry Pressure
Giulio Centemero, a member of parliament, and Federico Freni, Undersecretary of State at the Ministry of Economy and Finance from the co-governing League party, announced on Tuesday that the proposed tax increase would be "significantly lowered" during parliamentary discussions. This adjustment reflects growing concerns that overly aggressive taxation could push crypto activity into unregulated or informal markets.
👉 Discover how global tax policies are shaping the future of digital asset investments.
In a joint statement, Centemero and Freni emphasized: “It’s time to stop treating cryptocurrency with prejudice.” Their remarks highlight a broader push to align Italy’s fiscal policies with the realities of an evolving digital economy rather than discouraging innovation through punitive measures.
Industry experts and crypto advocates have long argued that high tax rates on digital assets could lead to capital flight, reduced compliance, and diminished trust in formal financial systems. With Bitcoin recently surpassing the $100,000 milestone, the timing of these debates has become even more critical.
Current Status and Legislative Timeline
Italy’s parliament must finalize the national budget by the end of December. Any changes to tax law—including those related to cryptocurrency—are subject to approval during this legislative process. While the initial 42% rate was projected to generate approximately $180,000 in annual revenue, revised estimates suggest a more moderate 28% rate might be adopted instead, which would yield lower returns but improve regulatory acceptance.
Notably, last year, Italy faced widespread criticism for proposing a de facto 2,000% tax on crypto transactions exceeding €2,000—effectively targeting small-scale traders. That proposal was widely seen as impractical and economically unsound. The current debate signals a maturing approach to digital asset taxation, favoring sustainability over short-term revenue extraction.
European Context: Denmark's Market-Valuation Approach
Beyond Italy, other European nations are also rethinking their crypto tax frameworks. In Denmark, policymakers are advancing a novel model that treats cryptocurrency holdings as capital income subject to annual mark-to-market taxation. Unlike traditional systems that tax gains only upon sale or exchange, this method would assess value changes each year, regardless of whether the asset is liquidated.
👉 Explore how new tax models could impact your long-term crypto strategy.
This approach aims to address the challenges posed by decentralized assets operating outside conventional banking oversight. A government-appointed council noted that the lack of centralized control makes tracking and taxing crypto particularly difficult under existing rules. If approved, Denmark’s new system could take effect as early as January 1, 2026.
The Danish Ministry of Taxation plans to introduce a legislative proposal in early 2025 based on the council’s recommendations. Crucially, the bill would require crypto service providers to report user transaction data—enhancing transparency and enforcement under the proposed regime.
U.S. Developments: IRS Enforcement and Reporting Rules
Across the Atlantic, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) continues to strengthen its oversight of cryptocurrency transactions. Brokers and exchanges are already required to report certain types of crypto sales, aligning digital assets with traditional financial instruments for tax purposes.
However, regulatory clarity remains a point of contention. Consensys, the developer behind the widely used MetaMask wallet, has publicly criticized draft IRS reporting forms for lacking clear guidance and using an overly broad definition of “broker.” The company warns this could result in multiple parties reporting the same transaction—leading to confusion, duplication, and potential compliance risks for users.
Moreover, the IRS has signaled it will begin publicly disclosing criminal tax evasion cases involving cryptocurrency. This marks a new front in its enforcement strategy, underscoring the agency’s commitment to treating digital assets as fully taxable entities within the formal economy.
Core Keywords Integration
Throughout this evolving landscape, several core keywords remain central:
- cryptocurrency capital gains tax
- Italy crypto tax policy
- digital asset taxation
- crypto tax compliance
- Bitcoin tax implications
- global crypto regulations
- mark-to-market crypto tax
- crypto reporting requirements
These terms naturally emerge in discussions around legislative reform, investor behavior, and international coordination—reflecting both search intent and topical relevance.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Why is Italy reconsidering its proposed 42% crypto tax?
A: Due to criticism from industry stakeholders and concerns within the ruling coalition that such a high rate could drive crypto activity underground or offshore, reducing overall compliance and revenue.
Q: Will Italy keep the current 26% capital gains tax on crypto?
A: While not confirmed, government sources indicate the possibility of maintaining the existing 26% rate or adopting a modest increase—potentially around 28%—depending on final negotiations.
Q: How does Denmark’s proposed crypto tax differ from Italy’s?
A: Denmark plans to implement an annual mark-to-market system, taxing unrealized gains each year. Italy currently taxes only realized gains upon disposal or exchange.
Q: What impact could these tax changes have on investors?
A: Higher or more complex taxes may discourage retail participation and prompt investors to seek jurisdictions with clearer, more favorable frameworks—potentially affecting innovation and market growth.
Q: Are there international efforts to standardize crypto taxation?
A: While no global standard exists yet, organizations like the OECD and EU are actively promoting greater harmonization to prevent tax arbitrage and ensure fair treatment across borders.
Q: How can crypto users stay compliant with changing tax laws?
A: By maintaining accurate transaction records, using reliable tracking tools, and consulting tax professionals familiar with digital assets—especially as reporting requirements expand worldwide.
👉 Stay ahead of regulatory changes and optimize your crypto portfolio with real-time insights.
Conclusion
As governments grapple with how to regulate and tax decentralized digital assets, Italy’s pivot on its proposed crypto capital gains hike reflects a broader trend: balancing fiscal goals with economic realism. With countries like Denmark experimenting with innovative valuation models and the U.S. tightening enforcement, clarity and fairness in taxation will be key to fostering responsible innovation.
For investors and developers alike, understanding these shifts isn’t just about compliance—it’s about positioning for long-term success in a rapidly transforming financial ecosystem.