In a bold move signaling a shift in European financial discourse, French Member of Parliament Sarah Knafo has publicly urged the European Union to consider adopting Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset. Her proposal, which emerged following a high-profile meeting with Michael Saylor—CEO of MicroStrategy and one of the most vocal Bitcoin advocates—challenges the EU’s current trajectory toward centralized digital currencies like the digital euro.
Knafo’s stance positions decentralized finance at the heart of Europe’s long-term economic resilience, advocating for Bitcoin not just as a speculative asset, but as a viable store of value and hedge against inflation. This perspective aligns with growing global interest in digital assets as alternatives to traditional monetary systems.
A New Vision for European Financial Sovereignty
At the core of Knafo’s argument is the idea of financial sovereignty. While several EU nations have recently pushed to repatriate their gold reserves from foreign vaults—a symbolic act of reclaiming control over national wealth—Knafo proposes a more forward-thinking alternative: embracing Bitcoin as a modern form of monetary insurance.
"Gold was the reserve asset of the 20th century. Bitcoin could be the reserve asset of the 21st," said Knafo during a parliamentary discussion.
Unlike physical gold, Bitcoin offers unparalleled portability, divisibility, and transparency through its blockchain ledger. More importantly, its fixed supply cap of 21 million coins makes it inherently resistant to inflation—a critical concern amid rising public debt and currency devaluation risks across developed economies.
👉 Discover how institutional adoption is reshaping the future of finance.
Bitcoin vs. CBDC: A Fundamental Choice
Knafo’s endorsement comes at a pivotal moment in the EU’s digital currency debate. While the European Central Bank continues development on the digital euro, Knafo warns that such Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) may deepen state control over personal finances rather than enhance freedom.
In contrast, Bitcoin operates independently of any central authority. It cannot be inflated at will, censored, or programmatically restricted—features that appeal to policymakers concerned about overreach and systemic fragility.
The distinction is crucial:
- CBDCs offer efficiency and traceability but risk enabling surveillance and capital controls.
- Bitcoin offers scarcity, decentralization, and censorship resistance—qualities increasingly valued in an era of geopolitical volatility.
This ideological divide reflects a broader tension within the EU: whether to double down on centralized financial infrastructure or explore decentralized alternatives that could future-proof its economy.
Influence of Bitcoin Thought Leaders
Knafo’s shift in perspective was significantly influenced by her conversation with Michael Saylor, whose company, MicroStrategy, holds over 200,000 BTC—the largest corporate Bitcoin treasury in the world. Saylor is renowned for framing Bitcoin as “digital property” and advocating its adoption by governments and institutions alike.
Their discussion centered on real-world case studies, including how countries like El Salvador have leveraged Bitcoin for financial inclusion and remittance efficiency. Saylor emphasized Bitcoin’s role as a long-term treasury reserve, arguing that nation-states should treat it similarly to gold.
“If a corporation can hold Bitcoin on its balance sheet, why can’t a country?” Saylor remarked during a public talk referenced by Knafo.
This line of reasoning is gaining traction beyond France. Lawmakers in Germany, Portugal, and even within the European Parliament have begun questioning whether the EU should diversify its reserves beyond fiat and gold.
Strategic Benefits and Challenges Ahead
Adopting Bitcoin as a strategic reserve would mark a radical departure from conventional monetary policy—but not without merit. Key advantages include:
- Inflation protection: With no central issuer, Bitcoin resists monetary debasement.
- Geopolitical insulation: Reduces reliance on U.S.-dominated financial systems like SWIFT.
- Fiscal innovation: Could attract blockchain investment and position the EU as a leader in Web3.
However, significant challenges remain:
- Price volatility: While decreasing over time, Bitcoin’s price swings require careful risk management.
- Regulatory complexity: Integrating a decentralized asset into centralized fiscal frameworks demands new legal frameworks.
- Cybersecurity preparedness: Secure custody solutions must be prioritized to protect public holdings.
Despite these hurdles, Knafo argues that the EU cannot afford to ignore technological transformation. “We regulate what we understand,” she stated. “It’s time for Europe to understand Bitcoin.”
👉 Explore secure ways to engage with digital assets today.
The Broader Context: EU’s Digital Transformation
Knafo’s proposal doesn’t exist in isolation. It fits within the EU’s wider push toward digital innovation—from the Digital Markets Act to open banking reforms. The bloc has already invested heavily in blockchain research through initiatives like the European Blockchain Services Infrastructure (EBSI).
Now, integrating Bitcoin into strategic reserves could serve as a natural extension of this vision—one that prioritizes autonomy, security, and long-term value preservation.
Moreover, with increasing adoption by sovereign wealth funds and pension systems worldwide, the idea of state-held Bitcoin is no longer fringe. Nations are beginning to see digital assets not as threats, but as tools for economic modernization.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What does it mean for Bitcoin to be a 'strategic reserve'?
A: It means holding Bitcoin as part of a nation’s official reserves—similar to gold or foreign currencies—to preserve value, ensure financial stability, and reduce dependency on external monetary systems.
Q: How is Bitcoin different from the digital euro?
A: The digital euro is a central bank-issued currency under full government control. Bitcoin is decentralized, scarce, and operates independently of any institution, offering greater financial freedom but less direct regulatory oversight.
Q: Could adopting Bitcoin destabilize the euro?
A: Not necessarily. If adopted gradually and transparently—as part of a diversified reserve strategy—Bitcoin could enhance confidence in Europe’s financial resilience without undermining the euro’s role.
Q: Is any EU country currently holding Bitcoin?
A: As of now, no EU member state officially holds Bitcoin in its reserves. However, discussions are growing louder in France, Germany, and the Netherlands about pilot programs and feasibility studies.
Q: What prevents the EU from adopting Bitcoin quickly?
A: Regulatory caution, institutional inertia, and concerns over price volatility are major barriers. Additionally, achieving consensus among 27 member states on such a transformative policy remains challenging.
Q: How would the EU store Bitcoin securely?
A: Through cold storage solutions (offline wallets), multi-signature protocols, and potentially partnerships with regulated custodians specializing in institutional-grade digital asset security.
The conversation sparked by Sarah Knafo is more than political rhetoric—it's a reflection of evolving attitudes toward money in the digital age. As global trust in traditional financial systems wavers, Bitcoin presents a compelling alternative rooted in transparency, scarcity, and decentralization.
Whether the EU acts on this proposal remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the debate over Bitcoin, financial sovereignty, and the future of digital assets has officially entered Europe’s mainstream political arena.