The Philippines has emerged as a key player in Southeast Asia’s fast-evolving virtual asset landscape, driven by rising digital adoption, financial inclusion goals, and proactive regulatory frameworks. As global interest in cryptocurrencies and blockchain-based financial services grows, the country is positioning itself at the forefront of responsible innovation—balancing technological advancement with consumer protection and financial integrity.
This article explores the current state of virtual asset regulation in the Philippines, detailing the roles of major regulatory bodies, licensing requirements for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) and Crypto Asset Service Providers (CASP), and key market developments. We also compare the Philippine model with Taiwan’s upcoming Virtual Asset Management Bill to highlight regional regulatory trends.
Regulatory Framework: A Multi-Agency Approach
Unlike jurisdictions that centralize virtual asset oversight under one authority, the Philippines adopts a multi-agency regulatory framework, with responsibilities divided based on the nature of the activity:
🏦 Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP)
As the central bank, BSP regulates entities involved in money transmission, exchange, and custody of virtual assets. Under its purview, VASPs are treated as Money Service Businesses (MSBs) and must obtain a Certificate of Authority (COA).
Key BSP requirements:
Minimum paid-in capital:
- ₱50 million (~$959,000) for VASPs offering custody services
- ₱10 million (~$192,000) for non-custodial platforms
- Strict compliance with Anti-Money Laundering/Countering Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) standards aligned with FATF guidelines
- Mandatory risk disclosures, cybersecurity protocols, and customer complaint mechanisms
Since September 2022, BSP has placed a three-year moratorium on new VASP licenses for non-bank institutions to reassess risks and refine its regulatory approach—set to expire in September 2025.
👉 Discover how global regulators are shaping the future of crypto compliance.
📈 Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The SEC steps in when virtual assets qualify as securities, such as investment contracts or tokenized equity. In these cases, issuance, trading, and related services fall under its jurisdiction.
In late 2024, the SEC released a draft Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) Rulebook, aiming to:
- Define CASPs clearly based on the services they offer (e.g., trading, issuance, advisory)
- Regulate Security Token Offerings (STOs) and unregistered ICOs
- Align with international standards from IOSCO (International Organization of Securities Commissions)
- Introduce licensing, disclosure, and market integrity rules
This move signals a more structured approach to regulating crypto investments beyond basic AML checks.
🔍 Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC)
AMLC oversees all regulated entities—including VASPs—for compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA). It collaborates closely with BSP and SEC to detect and prevent illicit financial flows through virtual assets.
Given past concerns over being placed on the FATF “gray list,” the Philippines has significantly strengthened its AML/CFT enforcement, making AMLC a critical pillar in the virtual asset ecosystem.
🌐 Cagayan Economic Zone Authority (CEZA)
Located in northern Luzon, CEZA operates as a special economic zone promoting itself as the "Crypto Valley of Asia." It offers an alternative licensing path—the Offshore Virtual Currency Exchange (OVCE)—for firms serving international clients.
However:
- OVCE licensees cannot serve Philippine residents without also obtaining a BSP VASP license
- The model attracts offshore-focused exchanges but does not replace national regulatory compliance
Key Market Players: Coins.ph and Maya
Despite the licensing freeze, two major players dominate the Philippine virtual asset market:
Coins.ph
- Founded in 2014 by Silicon Valley entrepreneurs
- One of the first BSP-licensed VASPs
Offers:
- Digital wallet (bill payments, mobile reloads, P2P transfers)
- Cryptocurrency trading and storage
- OTC desk for institutional clients (Coins TradeDesk)
- API infrastructure for partners (Coins Access)
- Stablecoin pilot (PHPC, pegged to PHP) via BSP sandbox
- Serves approximately 16 million registered users
Coins.ph exemplifies how virtual assets can drive financial inclusion, especially among the unbanked population.
Maya Philippines, Inc.
- Formerly PayMaya; rebranded in 2022
- Operates under Voyage Innovation, a fintech unicorn
- Holds both digital banking and VASP licenses
Integrated app offering:
- Digital banking (Maya Bank)
- Crypto trading and wallet
- Investment products (funds, stocks)
- Insurance, QR payments, bill settlement
- Over 50 million virtual asset wallet users
- ~5.4 million digital banking users as of 2024
Maya represents the convergence of traditional finance and crypto—offering seamless access to both worlds within a single platform.
👉 See how integrated financial ecosystems are transforming user experience in emerging markets.
Comparative Insight: Philippines vs. Taiwan
While both economies are advancing virtual asset regulation, their approaches differ significantly:
| Aspect | Philippines | Taiwan |
|---|---|---|
| Governing Body | Dual oversight: BSP (payments), SEC (securities) | Single regulator: Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) |
| Licensing Model | Separate VASP (BSP) and CASP (SEC) permits | Unified VASP license under FSC |
| Stablecoin Regulation | No dedicated framework yet; PHPC in sandbox testing | Draft law includes specific chapter; only banks may issue PHP-pegged stablecoins |
| AML/CFT Alignment | Fully FATF-compliant | FATF-aligned since 2021; enhanced in new draft |
| Consumer Protection | Risk disclosure, complaint systems, security mandates | Stronger safeguards: asset segregation, trust arrangements, anti-fraud clauses |
Taiwan’s proposed Virtual Asset Management Bill, announced in March 2025, aims to consolidate oversight under one roof—potentially streamlining compliance but increasing centralized control.
Future Outlook and Industry Implications
The Philippine virtual asset sector stands at a pivotal juncture:
- The BSP licensing freeze ends in 2025, likely opening doors for new entrants
- Finalization of the SEC’s CASP rules will clarify investor protections and market conduct
- Demand for regulated stablecoins is growing amid high remittance volumes (~$40B annually)
- Cross-border interoperability and remittance efficiency remain key drivers
For businesses, navigating this evolving landscape requires:
- Proactive engagement with regulators
- Robust AML/KYC systems
- Clear product categorization (currency vs. security)
- Investment in cybersecurity and user education
👉 Stay ahead of regulatory shifts with real-time market intelligence.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Can foreign crypto exchanges operate in the Philippines?
A: Yes, but only if licensed by BSP or operating under CEZA’s OVCE framework—without serving local residents unless fully compliant.
Q: Is cryptocurrency legal tender in the Philippines?
A: No. The Philippine peso is the sole legal tender. Cryptocurrencies are recognized as virtual assets for investment or payment processing, not official currency.
Q: Are profits from crypto trading taxable?
A: While no specific crypto tax law exists yet, gains may be subject to income or capital gains taxes under general principles. The Bureau of Internal Revenue is expected to issue clearer guidance soon.
Q: What happens if a VASP fails to comply with BSP rules?
A: Penalties include fines, suspension of operations, revocation of license, and potential criminal charges under AMLA.
Q: Can banks issue stablecoins in the Philippines?
A: Not yet formally permitted. However, BSP is exploring this through pilot programs like PHPC. Taiwan’s model may influence future policy direction.
Q: How does the Philippines handle decentralized finance (DeFi)?
A: DeFi remains largely unregulated. Regulators are monitoring developments but have not issued formal rules for smart contract-based lending or yield platforms.
Conclusion
The Philippines is crafting a nuanced and adaptive regulatory environment for virtual assets—one that recognizes their transformative potential while safeguarding financial stability. With strong institutional coordination between BSP, SEC, and AMLC, combined with innovative homegrown platforms like Coins.ph and Maya, the nation is building a resilient foundation for long-term growth.
As neighboring markets like Taiwan advance similar frameworks, regional harmonization could enhance cross-border compliance and foster greater investor confidence. For stakeholders—from startups to investors—the message is clear: compliance is not a barrier to innovation—it’s the foundation.
Keywords: Philippines virtual asset regulation, VASP license Philippines, Crypto Asset Service Provider, BSP crypto rules, SEC Philippines crypto, FATF compliance Philippines, Maya Coins.ph comparison